Ownership Structure, Legitimacy, and Competition in the Pension Fund Industry: A Financial Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11565/gesten.v2i2.42Abstract
Allowing the entry of non-profit pension fund administrators (AFPs) and creating a state-owned AFP are measures aimed at increasing the legitimacy and competitiveness of the AFP industry through institutions whose ultimate purpose is not to maximize their owners' profit. Little is known, however, about the monetary benefits and costs this measure might have for members. This study analyzes the hypothetical case in which current administrators distributed part of the difference between their fee income and their operating costs, which in 2016 amounted to USD 524 million. In the base scenario, half of these resources would have made it possible to provide an annual benefit of around CLP 30,000 for the average contributor, or to increase the pension of the average retiree by close to CLP 12,000 per month. If these resources were instead invested in current contributors' funds to finance their future pensions, those pensions could rise by up to 3.5% for the youngest cohorts.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 GESTIÓN Y TENDENCIAS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 1,390
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 497
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 187 views, 154 downloads.
CitationsTimes other scholarly works cited this article, according to OpenAlex and Crossref. The two indexes cover different sources, so their counts differ. : OpenAlex 1 · Crossref 1
Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. United States 25% · Singapore 12% · China 10%
0.36 downloads per view (journal average 0.67).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics