The Year We Lived Dangerously: A Before and After for Business Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11565/gesten.v5i2.121Abstract
The year 2020 has brought about a rupture of major proportions in everyday life. Our ways of dwelling, of producing, of relating to one another have been interrupted —halted, rather— and with that we have faced the abrupt and compulsory opportunity to observe ourselves and reflect. What we are living through today is not merely a health emergency or a public health problem. In a globalized world articulated through dynamic and competitive market relations, the halt and the confinement have wrought havoc. What emerges as still more serious is the lack of alternatives for organizing the ways of sustaining the materiality of life, as a direct consequence of a monotone and hegemonic economic conception that was left without a "value proposition" in the face of an "externality" it never modeled. Correspondingly, the management strategies that arose under the shelter of that economic vision, and which have been widely and hegemonically disseminated through traditional business education, also reach their limit. A cursory glance at the contents and methodologies of academic programs in the discipline of management suffices to make us realize that we continue educating for a world that no longer exists. It is urgent, more pressing than ever, to review, revisit, and challenge what we have understood until now as business education.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 GESTIÓN Y TENDENCIAS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Article usage
- ViewsTimes this article's page was opened since the journal started recording statistics. One person can visit more than once.
- 463
- DownloadsTimes the full text of this article (usually the PDF) was opened or downloaded.
- 331
All time, as recorded by the journal.
Last 2 years: 144 views, 121 downloads.
Main countries of traffic origin:Countries this article was consulted from, according to the internet connection. They are not necessarily people. United States 16% · Singapore 12% · United Kingdom 10%
0.71 downloads per view (journal average 0.67).Downloads of the full text for every abstract view of this article, compared with the whole journal.
Explore the journal's metrics